Coleman Challenge - Week 1 - Double barrel bacon hotdog wrap
When someone smokes marijuana, they get the much-fabled "munchies." I know that this occurs, I am just at a loss as to why it does occur.
I've just become a vegetarian for dietary reasons, and recently started eating very healthy foods. I also stopped eating when I have the munchies, and if I really want to eat, I'll have some watermelon or another type of fruit. So far, I've lost 15 lbs in the last 2 weeks.
Perp Trade Mark
Monday, March 5, 2012
Brighten Up Your Outdoor Trips besides having a good coleman lantern
.jpg)
| Stan, Help me go around the tricks Talkshoe uses to ban me. I am a Troll and spammer not a Hacker (posted by Lloyd Davies-Supreme TimeLORD ) | |
Your Stainless Steel Hero 
You are all over the net. You've been there for years, too, and now your latest victims (the nimbusters) know it.
Yet another blog about you (one of seven more that we've found):
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com
A profile that's been up since 2006:
http://www.blogger.c...976230788011716
And a great way to send anonymous email to anywhere you want:
http://www.blogger.c...506074462072242
All of the above is clear evidence that your crap started long before you attacked nimbusters.
You are all over the net. You've been there for years, too, and now your latest victims (the nimbusters) know it. Yet another blog about you (one of seven more that we've found):
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com A profile that's been up since 2006: http://www.blogger.c...976230788011716 And a great way to send anonymous email to anywhere you want: http://www.blogger.c...506074462072242 All of the above is clear evidence that your crap started long before you attacked nimbusters.
archangel.gab@gmail.com
Gabriel Arch
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com
trash
Yet another blog about you (one of seven more that we've found):
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com
A profile that's been up since 2006:
http://www.blogger.c...976230788011716
And a great way to send anonymous email to anywhere you want:
http://www.blogger.c...506074462072242
All of the above is clear evidence that your crap started long before you attacked nimbusters.
You are all over the net. You've been there for years, too, and now your latest victims (the nimbusters) know it. Yet another blog about you (one of seven more that we've found):
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com A profile that's been up since 2006: http://www.blogger.c...976230788011716 And a great way to send anonymous email to anywhere you want: http://www.blogger.c...506074462072242 All of the above is clear evidence that your crap started long before you attacked nimbusters.
archangel.gab@gmail.com
Gabriel Arch
http://swordbrethren***.blogspot.com
trash
NIM Busters is not a group, it is a message board, and it consists mainly of people from the old adolfhitler.com board and the Hal Turner board.
It was started years ago as a spoof on NIM, as I recall 5 or 7 of us posted there. vonblvubber who started the board, sledgehammer88, Mobutu, Bounty Hunter, Miller and few others who never used a regular name [i used the name Arnold at the time]. The rule when it started was "rules we have no stinking rules" so nothing was every deleted.
Someone posted the url on the Hal Turner board and a lot of people came over from the Hal turner site, the majority being WN. People started using it for its free speech attributes, some abused it while others Tos'ed it.
So NIM Busters is not a group just a message board various people use, some use it to show their ignorance others use it to expose others, some use it for discussion. WN and antis both use the board and I would say WN outnumber the Antis now. More WN posts are made than anti posts if you read inbetween the lines
I don't really know how many use the board, but I have been in chat and six other people were there. Chat is not like the board, it is a little more civil and a little more serious.
PS
the main perverts seen to be 3 WN named Steve,Lloyd and Roger, maybe someone else can give a background on them, I do know anything about them other than they all have WN views and spam the board with gay porn.
It was started years ago as a spoof on NIM, as I recall 5 or 7 of us posted there. vonblvubber who started the board, sledgehammer88, Mobutu, Bounty Hunter, Miller and few others who never used a regular name [i used the name Arnold at the time]. The rule when it started was "rules we have no stinking rules" so nothing was every deleted.
Someone posted the url on the Hal Turner board and a lot of people came over from the Hal turner site, the majority being WN. People started using it for its free speech attributes, some abused it while others Tos'ed it.
So NIM Busters is not a group just a message board various people use, some use it to show their ignorance others use it to expose others, some use it for discussion. WN and antis both use the board and I would say WN outnumber the Antis now. More WN posts are made than anti posts if you read inbetween the lines
I don't really know how many use the board, but I have been in chat and six other people were there. Chat is not like the board, it is a little more civil and a little more serious.
PS
the main perverts seen to be 3 WN named Steve,Lloyd and Roger, maybe someone else can give a background on them, I do know anything about them other than they all have WN views and spam the board with gay porn.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Spain says it will miss 2012 deficit target
MADRID - Spain's prime minister said Friday that his recession-ridden country will miss its deficit goal for this year, risking sanctions from the European Union.
The announcement came as the government reported more grim economic news: A big rise in claims for jobless benefits last month and a new forecast that Spanish economic output will fall 1.7 percent this year, worse than the 1 percent forecast recently by the EU and the 1.5 percent predicted just week ago by Madrid itself.
Spain's government deficit will reach 5.8 percent of economic output this year, Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said after an EU summit in Brussels. That is much higher than the 4.4 percent Madrid had promised to the other states in the 27-nation bloc.
However, Rajoy said Spain still aims to cuts its deficit to 3 percent in 2013, which would bring the country back in line with the bloc's fiscal rules. He didn't say how his EU counterparts reacted to the higher deficit, but insisted that he was committed to austerity.
Rajoy's acknowledgment doesn't come as a surprise, as Spain sailed far past last year's deficit target. Instead of 6 percent of gross domestic product, the 2011 deficit reached 8.5 percent.
However, it puts Madrid on collision course with the EU and its partners in the euro currency union, which have focused on austerity as the best way of fighting off a crippling debt crisis.
Rajoy spoke in Brussels after a summit of eurozone leaders. On the new deficit goal, he said "I did not consult other European leaders and I will inform the Commission in April," he said. "This is a sovereign decision by Spain."
In Madrid, Economy Minister Luis de Guindos announced the 1.7 percent GDP contraction forecast and said the economy will shrink in the first two quarters of this year and possibly in the third too, before starting to pick up. He blamed subdued domestic consumption, higher oil prices and a slower world economy.
A spokesman for the European Commission said Friday that the EU's executive had not softened this year's goal.
"The excessive deficit procedure foresees a target of 4.4 percent in 2012," said Amadeu Altafaj Tardio. "Therefore our assessment is based on that target."
He also warned that Madrid, which currently has an unemployment rate of nearly 23 percent and a shaky banking sector, could come under renewed market pressure if it fails to rein in its deficit.
"There is an issue of confidence at stake here," Altafaj Tardio said. He added that the Commission still wants Madrid to provide details on why last year's deficit was so much higher than expected and what it plans to do about it this year before the end of the month.
The Commission's reluctance to give Spain more leeway means the country risks being slapped with financial sanctions of up to 0.2 percent of GDP.
The announcement came as the government reported more grim economic news: A big rise in claims for jobless benefits last month and a new forecast that Spanish economic output will fall 1.7 percent this year, worse than the 1 percent forecast recently by the EU and the 1.5 percent predicted just week ago by Madrid itself.
Spain's government deficit will reach 5.8 percent of economic output this year, Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said after an EU summit in Brussels. That is much higher than the 4.4 percent Madrid had promised to the other states in the 27-nation bloc.
However, Rajoy said Spain still aims to cuts its deficit to 3 percent in 2013, which would bring the country back in line with the bloc's fiscal rules. He didn't say how his EU counterparts reacted to the higher deficit, but insisted that he was committed to austerity.
Rajoy's acknowledgment doesn't come as a surprise, as Spain sailed far past last year's deficit target. Instead of 6 percent of gross domestic product, the 2011 deficit reached 8.5 percent.
However, it puts Madrid on collision course with the EU and its partners in the euro currency union, which have focused on austerity as the best way of fighting off a crippling debt crisis.
Rajoy spoke in Brussels after a summit of eurozone leaders. On the new deficit goal, he said "I did not consult other European leaders and I will inform the Commission in April," he said. "This is a sovereign decision by Spain."
In Madrid, Economy Minister Luis de Guindos announced the 1.7 percent GDP contraction forecast and said the economy will shrink in the first two quarters of this year and possibly in the third too, before starting to pick up. He blamed subdued domestic consumption, higher oil prices and a slower world economy.
A spokesman for the European Commission said Friday that the EU's executive had not softened this year's goal.
"The excessive deficit procedure foresees a target of 4.4 percent in 2012," said Amadeu Altafaj Tardio. "Therefore our assessment is based on that target."
He also warned that Madrid, which currently has an unemployment rate of nearly 23 percent and a shaky banking sector, could come under renewed market pressure if it fails to rein in its deficit.
"There is an issue of confidence at stake here," Altafaj Tardio said. He added that the Commission still wants Madrid to provide details on why last year's deficit was so much higher than expected and what it plans to do about it this year before the end of the month.
The Commission's reluctance to give Spain more leeway means the country risks being slapped with financial sanctions of up to 0.2 percent of GDP.
Obama hits up Wall Street for campaign funds
President Obama's fundraising blitz in New York City on Thursday included a $35,800-a-plate dinner with a potentially hostile crowd: Wall Street executives. "So many of you have had to defend me from your co-workers over the last three years," he told a group of 80 guests drawn mostly from the financial services industry who had gathered at a Manhattan restaurant to help raise money for his re-election campaign.
Attendees at the event, held at ABC Kitchen in the Flat Iron District, included prominent Wall Street figures such as Blair Effron, co-founder of boutique investment bank Centerview Partners, and Ralph Schlosstein, CEO of investment bank Evercore Partners (EVR), according to news reports. Yet despite the night's financial contributions, the bankers, hedge fund managers, and other securities professionals who helped bankroll Obama's 2008 campaign have largely withheld their support this time around.
The president has to date raised only $2.3 million from financial services PACs and financial firm employees, less than one-third of what he received from the industry four years ago. That represents a major reversal from Obama's first run at the White House. In only one example of the financial support he formerly enjoyed from parts of the securities and investment sector, Obama's second-largest source of corporate PAC donations in 2007 and 2008 were employees of investment bank Goldman Sachs (GS).
Mapping the candidate fundraisers in Manhattan
Obama fundraisers hit century markDodd-Frank: Loved by few, hated by many, essential to all
Wall Street's recent coolness comes as no surprise. Obama's support for financial reform, culminating in his signing the Dodd-Frank Act into law in 2010, has angered many banking executives. The law created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a new federal watchdog widely reviled by financial execs; restricted in principle Wall Street firms' proprietary trading activities; and established a framework for tighter industry regulation, among other measures. Bankers also have groused about new laws clamping down on banks' credit-card, overdraft, and merchant-processing fees. Meanwhile, Obama's fiscal-year 2013 budget proposes hitting the biggest financial firms with a "financial crisis responsibility fee" to compensate U.S. taxpayers for the banking bailout and to help homeowners refinance their mortgages.
Obama also has proposed raising taxes on high-income earners and last year expressed support for the Occupy Wall Street protests, saying in October that "the American people understand that not everybody has been following the rules, that Wall Street is an example of that."
Apart from the president's policies and more populist rhetoric in recent months, the presence of former private-equity executive Mitt Romney in the Republican primary is also siphoning money away from Obama. The former Massachusetts governor, a co-founder of buyout firm Bain Capital, has won large financial contributions from heavy-hitters including Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and chairman of private-equity firm Blackstone Group (BX); former Goldman Sachs CEO John Whitehead; JPMorgan Chase (JPM) vice-chairman James Lee; and hedge-fund investors John Paulson, Julian Robertson, and Paul Singer. And while Obama is outpacing Romney in most states around the nation in raising funds from individuals, the Republican front-runner has done better in places such as Connecticut and New Jersey, where many Wall Streeters live.
In the 2012 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Romney's top five contributors are Goldman, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley (MS), Credit Suisse (CS), and Citigroup (C), while other major financial industry donors include Barclays (BCS), UBS (UBS), and Wells Fargo (WFC). None of those companies rank among the top 20 contributors to the Obama campaign.
The flow of campaign money from large financial companies to Romney highlights the industry's priorities on a range for issues. For example, lobbyists for the the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, trade groups that represent the interests of banks and securities firms, are angling to weaken rules contained in Dodd-Frank that would restrain speculation in the energy markets. Wall Street firms also are pushing back against another provision in the law called the Volcker Rule that seeks to restrict banks' ability to trade for their own accounts and to invest in hedge and private equity funds. Other areas of concern include proposed global capital requirements for large banks and the amount of risk mortgage lenders might have to retain on their balance sheets.
In 2011, the financial industry spent a total more than $159 million on lobbying, according to CFRP. Large commercial banks spent a record $61.5 million.
Romney has said he would repeal Dodd-Frank. By contrast, the Obama administration has made the law a hallmark of the president's re-election campaign, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geither writing in op-ed in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday arguing that Dodd-Frank established "safer and more modern rules of the road for the financial industry."
Attendees at the event, held at ABC Kitchen in the Flat Iron District, included prominent Wall Street figures such as Blair Effron, co-founder of boutique investment bank Centerview Partners, and Ralph Schlosstein, CEO of investment bank Evercore Partners (EVR), according to news reports. Yet despite the night's financial contributions, the bankers, hedge fund managers, and other securities professionals who helped bankroll Obama's 2008 campaign have largely withheld their support this time around.
The president has to date raised only $2.3 million from financial services PACs and financial firm employees, less than one-third of what he received from the industry four years ago. That represents a major reversal from Obama's first run at the White House. In only one example of the financial support he formerly enjoyed from parts of the securities and investment sector, Obama's second-largest source of corporate PAC donations in 2007 and 2008 were employees of investment bank Goldman Sachs (GS).
Mapping the candidate fundraisers in Manhattan
Obama fundraisers hit century markDodd-Frank: Loved by few, hated by many, essential to all
Wall Street's recent coolness comes as no surprise. Obama's support for financial reform, culminating in his signing the Dodd-Frank Act into law in 2010, has angered many banking executives. The law created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a new federal watchdog widely reviled by financial execs; restricted in principle Wall Street firms' proprietary trading activities; and established a framework for tighter industry regulation, among other measures. Bankers also have groused about new laws clamping down on banks' credit-card, overdraft, and merchant-processing fees. Meanwhile, Obama's fiscal-year 2013 budget proposes hitting the biggest financial firms with a "financial crisis responsibility fee" to compensate U.S. taxpayers for the banking bailout and to help homeowners refinance their mortgages.
Obama also has proposed raising taxes on high-income earners and last year expressed support for the Occupy Wall Street protests, saying in October that "the American people understand that not everybody has been following the rules, that Wall Street is an example of that."
Apart from the president's policies and more populist rhetoric in recent months, the presence of former private-equity executive Mitt Romney in the Republican primary is also siphoning money away from Obama. The former Massachusetts governor, a co-founder of buyout firm Bain Capital, has won large financial contributions from heavy-hitters including Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder and chairman of private-equity firm Blackstone Group (BX); former Goldman Sachs CEO John Whitehead; JPMorgan Chase (JPM) vice-chairman James Lee; and hedge-fund investors John Paulson, Julian Robertson, and Paul Singer. And while Obama is outpacing Romney in most states around the nation in raising funds from individuals, the Republican front-runner has done better in places such as Connecticut and New Jersey, where many Wall Streeters live.
In the 2012 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Romney's top five contributors are Goldman, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley (MS), Credit Suisse (CS), and Citigroup (C), while other major financial industry donors include Barclays (BCS), UBS (UBS), and Wells Fargo (WFC). None of those companies rank among the top 20 contributors to the Obama campaign.
The flow of campaign money from large financial companies to Romney highlights the industry's priorities on a range for issues. For example, lobbyists for the the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, trade groups that represent the interests of banks and securities firms, are angling to weaken rules contained in Dodd-Frank that would restrain speculation in the energy markets. Wall Street firms also are pushing back against another provision in the law called the Volcker Rule that seeks to restrict banks' ability to trade for their own accounts and to invest in hedge and private equity funds. Other areas of concern include proposed global capital requirements for large banks and the amount of risk mortgage lenders might have to retain on their balance sheets.
In 2011, the financial industry spent a total more than $159 million on lobbying, according to CFRP. Large commercial banks spent a record $61.5 million.
Romney has said he would repeal Dodd-Frank. By contrast, the Obama administration has made the law a hallmark of the president's re-election campaign, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geither writing in op-ed in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday arguing that Dodd-Frank established "safer and more modern rules of the road for the financial industry."
A Dollar Buys Today what $0.17 Did in 1970.
"Forget the modest 3.1 percent rise in the Consumer Price Index, the government's widely used measure of inflation. Everyday prices are up some 8 percent over the past year, according to the American Institute for Economic Research."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505144_162-57387655/inflation-not-as-low-as-you-think/
The not-for-profit research group measures inflation without looking at the big, one-time purchases that can skew the numbers. That means they don't look at the price of houses, furniture, appliances, cars, or computers. Instead, AIER focuses on Americans' typical daily purchases, such as food, gasoline, child care, prescription drugs, phone and television service, and other household products.
The institute contends that to get a good read on inflation's "sticker shock" effect, you must look at the cost of goods that the average household buys at least once a month and factor in only the kinds of expenses that are subject to change. That, too, eliminates the cost of housing because when you finance your home with a fixed-rate mortgage, that expense remains constant until you refinance or move.
Will gas prices stall the economy?
Why higher oil and gas prices are good news
VIDEO: Ask the experts -- gas prices
The group maintains that this index better measures the real-world impact of price changes, particularly for people on a budget. And, largely as the result of the recent run-up in gas prices, this "everyday price index" (EPI) suggests that Americans are being pinched far more tightly than the official inflation measure would have you believe.
Over the past year, the EPI is up just over 8 percent, according to the economics group. The biggest factor: Motor fuel and transportation costs are up 21.06 percent from year-ago levels. The cost of food, prescription drugs, and tobacco also have increased faster than the government's inflation measure, rising 3.56 percent, 4.21 percent, and 3.4 percent, respectively.
On the bright side, prices of household fuel (natural gas and electricity) and supplies have increased only 2.74 percent; recreation and personal care products are up less than 1 percent; and telephone or Internet services are down 0.66 percent.
Admittedly, the purchases that the EPI tracks make up slightly less than 40 percent of the average household budget. But Steven Cunningham, research and education director at AIER, says these items are what contribute to the "sticker shock at the gasoline pump and the supermarket check-out line."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505144_162-57387655/inflation-not-as-low-as-you-think/
The not-for-profit research group measures inflation without looking at the big, one-time purchases that can skew the numbers. That means they don't look at the price of houses, furniture, appliances, cars, or computers. Instead, AIER focuses on Americans' typical daily purchases, such as food, gasoline, child care, prescription drugs, phone and television service, and other household products.
The institute contends that to get a good read on inflation's "sticker shock" effect, you must look at the cost of goods that the average household buys at least once a month and factor in only the kinds of expenses that are subject to change. That, too, eliminates the cost of housing because when you finance your home with a fixed-rate mortgage, that expense remains constant until you refinance or move.
Will gas prices stall the economy?
Why higher oil and gas prices are good news
VIDEO: Ask the experts -- gas prices
The group maintains that this index better measures the real-world impact of price changes, particularly for people on a budget. And, largely as the result of the recent run-up in gas prices, this "everyday price index" (EPI) suggests that Americans are being pinched far more tightly than the official inflation measure would have you believe.
Over the past year, the EPI is up just over 8 percent, according to the economics group. The biggest factor: Motor fuel and transportation costs are up 21.06 percent from year-ago levels. The cost of food, prescription drugs, and tobacco also have increased faster than the government's inflation measure, rising 3.56 percent, 4.21 percent, and 3.4 percent, respectively.
On the bright side, prices of household fuel (natural gas and electricity) and supplies have increased only 2.74 percent; recreation and personal care products are up less than 1 percent; and telephone or Internet services are down 0.66 percent.
Admittedly, the purchases that the EPI tracks make up slightly less than 40 percent of the average household budget. But Steven Cunningham, research and education director at AIER, says these items are what contribute to the "sticker shock at the gasoline pump and the supermarket check-out line."
Why Do I Love Burger King ??
Why Do I Love Burger King ??
Since its Florida beginnings more than 45 years ago when a Burger King hamburger cost 18(cent) and a WHOPPER sandwich cost 37(cent) Burger King Corporation has established restaurants around the world -- from Australia to Venezuela. ...
Did you know that Burger King has family nights every Tuesday? And even better they have fabulous deals that make it affordable for a family to go out to eat. Family night is from 4 to 8 PM and the pricing is as follows:
Kid's Meal - 99 cents!
Whopper Meal (Whopper, Fries, Drink) - $2.99!
That's a deal.
Kid's Meal - 99 cents!
Whopper Meal (Whopper, Fries, Drink) - $2.99!
That's a deal.
But Burger King is making that happen every Tuesday night at participating locations. Here is a list of the locations that have family night.
BURGER KING # 3677
4199 SOUTH SERVICE ROAD
ST. PETERS, MO 63376
636-928-0230
BURGER KING # 4040
1575 JUNGERMAN ROAD
ST PETERS MO
636-928-4549
BURGER KING # 9030
399 MAIN STREET
ST. PETERS, MO 63376
636-970-3377
BURGER KING # 11161
10890 WEST FLORISSANT
FERGUSON, MO 63135
314-522-6039
BURGER KING # 16259
6010 MID RIVERS MALL DRIVE
ST. PETERS, MO 63304
636-447-3208
BURGER KING # 8482
12701 OLIVE BLVD
CREVE COEUR , MO 63141
314-579-6080
BURGER KING #6038
5030 NATURAL BRIDGE ROAD
ST. LOUIS, MO 63115-1501
314-385-6215
BURGER KING #2139
3259 HAMPTON AVENUE
ST. LOUIS, MO 63139-2325
314-644-2415
And guess what? Macaroni Kid and Burger King are teaming up for Family Night! Macaroni Kid will be hosting Family night 4 weeks in a row at different locations!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)